Scoring methodology

Every brand score on this site is generated from one weights file. Nothing on this page is typed in by hand.

What the score measures

The score measures the blackjack a brand actually deals. The score does not measure the casino around the blackjack.

Two blocks make up the score. Block A scores the rules of the table. Block B scores the conditions of access.

Block A scores one table per brand. The scored table is the best documented table on the site that is not a multiplier format. Rules are never mixed across two tables, because a mixed rule vector describes a table nobody can sit at.

The weights

The Block A weight of a rule is derived from the published cost of that rule. Cost is measured in percentage points of player return.

Block B carries no published cost, so each Block B weight is assigned. Block B never outweighs Block A. The rules of a table are a direct cost to the player. The conditions of access are friction.

CriterionBlockWeightPublished cost
Payout on a natural blackjackTable rules161.39 pp
Deck count and shoe typeTable rules100.48 pp
Split limit, resplit and split acesTable rules60.19 pp
Dealer action on soft 17Table rules60.22 pp
Totals a player can double onTable rules60.18 pp
Double after splitTable rules50.14 pp
Dealer peek against no hole cardTable rules50.11 pp
SurrenderTable rules40.07 pp
Published withdrawal processing timeAccess conditions10n.a.
Blackjack tables with published rulesAccess conditions10n.a.
Span of published table limitsAccess conditions8n.a.
Published verification requirementsAccess conditions8n.a.
How a live bonus treats blackjackAccess conditions6n.a.
Total100

Weights version rev3, effective 2026-08-29.

Why the weights are these numbers

The payout on a natural blackjack is the largest single criterion. The reduced payout costs the player 1.39 percentage points. No other rule on the table costs a quarter as much.

Each Block A weight is the square root of the published cost of that rule. The Block A weights are then scaled to the block total. A straight cost allocation would give the payout almost the whole block. The remaining rules would then score as noise, and a player choosing between two good tables would learn nothing.

The build recomputes every Block A weight from the published costs on each run. A weight edited by hand fails the build.

How a missing field scores

A criterion with no published value scores zero points and keeps its full weight. The denominator is never reduced. A brand is never rewarded for publishing less.

No missing value is ever estimated, inferred to a plausible figure or filled from a comparable brand. A cell with no published value reads n.a. and states what is missing.

Two states are reported separately. A field marked n.a. means the operator does not publish the value. The absence is a finding about the operator.

A field marked pending means the research is not finished. A pending field is a gap in the work of this site and is not a finding about the operator. A score with any pending field is published as provisional.

Confidence classes

Every input carries a confidence class and a source URL. The class multiplies the points that criterion earns.

A claim this site has not verified does not score as a verified claim. An unverified claim is also not treated as false.

ClassMultiplierWhat the class means
confirmed1.00The operator publishes the value and this site read it at the source.
confirmed_existence_only0.50The operator publishes that the item exists and publishes no value for it.
reported0.50A source states the value and the operator does not confirm it.
inferred0.25The value follows from another published rule and is not stated directly.
assumed0.00No evidence supports the value, so it earns nothing.
n.a.0.00The value is not published in any source this site checked.
pending0.00This site has not finished researching the field.

House edge conventions

Every house edge on this site is stored in three conventions. The first is optimal play. The second is basic strategy with a cut card. The third is basic strategy with a continuous shuffle.

The continuous shuffle column is the engine default. The simulator reshuffles after every hand, so the continuous shuffle figure is the figure that describes what the simulator deals.

A cut card figure is never shown beside simulator output. The two describe different games and the gap reaches 0.15 percentage points at one deck. Cut card figures appear only inside the land based comparison module.

Every published figure carries the name of its convention. A figure with no convention named is a build failure.

When the solver and a published chart disagree

This site runs its own basic strategy solver. A solver carries an approximation error, and that error is recorded per rule set.

A published chart wins any cell where the disagreement is smaller than the approximation error of the solver. In that case the solver is not precise enough to overturn the published chart.

Where the disagreement is larger than the error bar, this site publishes its own number. The page says so and marks the cell.

This rule is written down here rather than left to a judgement call at the time.

Retest cadence and who tests

The rules and data desk performs every test. The desk holds the data spine and is accountable for it.

Every brand is retested every 90 days. The retest date is stored beside the inputs and appears on the brand page.

Four events trigger a retest before the 90 days elapse. A brand changes a table rule. A brand changes its published bonus terms. A brand changes licence or registered entity. A reader reports a rule that does not match the site.

A retest can lower a score. A score is not held at its previous value.

How the score is published

Every brand score on this site is published out of 10. A published score is rounded to 1 decimal place. The criterion weights sum to 100. The model total is divided by 10.

The order brands appear in is fixed and is not the score order. A higher score does not move a brand up a list.

What the score does not measure

The list below is published so the exclusions can be checked. Each item is excluded for a stated reason.

ExcludedReason
Headline value of a welcome bonusA headline bonus value is not a fact about the game.
Total number of games on the siteA total game count counts slots. A slot count says nothing about blackjack.
Software provider partnershipsA provider partnership is not a fact about the game.
VIP and loyalty schemesA loyalty scheme is not a fact about the game.
Site design and usabilitySite design cannot be measured against a published source.
Customer support channelsA support channel is not a fact about the game.
Multiplier format blackjack tablesThis site does not rank multiplier format tables. The pay tables are not published in full.
Player advantage rule configurationsPlayer advantage rule configurations exist in the trainer and the calculator only. No commercial surface carries one.
Commercial terms between the brand and this siteScoring a commercial term would make the score a function of the revenue of this site.

Affiliate relationship

This site earns a commission when a reader registers with a brand through a tracked link. The reader pays nothing extra.

Commission is not an input to any criterion in the model. A brand cannot pay for a score, a rank or a softer review.

This site tests 5 brands. This site holds a commercial relationship with each of those 5 brands. The limit on coverage is stated here rather than implied.

A brand that scores badly stays on the site with its score. A score is never removed because it is unflattering.

The files this page is built from

The weights, the inputs and the generated scores are all files in the site repository. A weight change re-scores every surface on the next build.

Where these rules come from

Every rule set on this site is recorded against a published source.

Review and provenance

Where a figure is not published, this page says so. No figure on this page is estimated.